Featured Articles

The Oscars, Fame, and Impermanence

Monday, heading home from the various Oscar celebrations, I heard Jane Russell died at 89. I'm embarrassed to say my first thought was, "who's Jane Russell?" Apparently she was famous in her day. Mary Oliver wrote, "Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon?" But 89! Isn't that enough for anyone? Or isn't it still "too soon" when it's someone you love?

Sunday night I was able to get into the coolest parties because I was with people who were way cooler than me. But in sixty years will they be saying, "who's Jane Russell?" about all of us?

As famous as any of us are, we will all fade into memory. We can spend our lives desperately seeking enough fame so that we won't be forgotten (though inevitably we will be) or we can remember that we only have our actions to leave behind and simply be in the present moment. It's hard to imagine that the self we've so desperately tried to solidify will one day disappear. But no matter how many Oscars one wins, one is S.O.L. when death comes. A lot of people were talking about how awful the Oscars were this year. In sixty years, most of us will be dead, and the rest won't remember Anne Hathaway's musical number.

I recently heard Jon Kabat-Zinn talk about how impermanence itself isn't a source of suffering. The problem is we're deluded enough to forget impermanence's inevitability and so we suffer when it rears its ugly head because we wish it to be otherwise. Or we suffer because we fear impermanence. We worry about our jobs, our kids, our relationships. Can you imagine not wishing impermanence to be suspended, when you consider the death of a loved one? I suppose that's why they call it practice. Maybe when you're enlightened you notice the wish and let it go. That seems kinda enlightened. It's hard to believe anyone wouldn't simply beg the gods to make an exception in their case. I guess that's why someone came up with gods, to have someone to beg when faced with death.

I remember reading that the unenlightened who surrounded the Buddha at the time of his death wailed with grief, while the enlightened did not. But I'm not enlightened. I would've been crying too. I know there's an upside to impermanence––the Civil War came to an end, as did apartheid, as did the Holocaust. Impermanence means change is inevitable, in China, Libya, Egypt, and even North Korea. Impermanence allows a seed to become a tree, a baby to become an adult. But it also allows an adult to return to the ground and nourish a seed, and become a tree. I wish that was easier to accept. But I simply want impermanence to work the way I want it to, when I want it to.

I may or may not hit the Oscar parties next year. Who knows? I may not even be around that long.

166
Vote for this article to appear in the Recommended list.

Comments

Thoughtful as always...

First off, "Who's Jane Russell?!" For shame, Jon... though it illustrates a point.

Yes, we will all be forgotten someday and a person's "achievements" are worth zero if they're miserable. Witness a certain Prime Minister in Italy, or a fabulously wealthy star of a now-cancelled sitcom, the list goes on. But what is tantalizing to people is the idea that they can transcend this possibility, and survive beyond death if they become famous enough.

I have a "pyramid" theory of fame, and it goes something like this: during your lifetime, you know of many, many famous people. Most people can name the entire cast of "Friends," and the starting five of their favorite basketball team, if they like basketball. But go back a generation, and the number gets smaller. Maybe you remember that "Dragnet" was a show, but you can't name the cast, and you can only remember Kareem-Abdul Jabbar as a player from the 1970s. Go back further, you climb the pyramid, and there are fewer and fewer people we know of. (Somebody please name me one person who was famous in the 13th century.) And then we get to the top of the pyramid, where a handful of names that have remained famous for centuries - Jesus Christ, Julius Caesar, Aristotle, Alexander the Great, and so on.

And while most people can rationalize that it's unlikely they'll become Aristotle or Shakespeare, talked about far beyond their own days, the pull is still there to somehow never die. It is, as you say, a fundamental unacceptance of reality.

But barring the possibility of immortality, there will at very least remain a mad scramble to be the loudest person at the bottom level of the pyramid. It is, after all, the only way to go one level up. And they will be there at the Oscar party, no doubt, or pacing the halls of the West Wing. I just hope they're happy.

thank you

and i agree, for shame, i am not so great with the pre 1970's film history. It's funny to think of Aristotle et al as famous in the same breath as Paris Hilton. But clearly there is that pull to be remembered. I think it's associated with that need to maintain one's solid self which as we know is not so solid. Thanks again.

Aristotle and Paris Hilton

Just realized I wasn't logged in... that was me above. Anyway, yes, odd to think of those two in the same breath, but I guess there's a distinction: Aristotle, though still trying to come up with something lasting, wasn't necessarily making it all about him, whereas the modern crop of fame-hunters very much want it to be all about them. Still, both are "famous" in some way.

I heard an interesting talk on the nature of "genius" a while ago, and it was pointed out that we've shifted from the idea that genius visits people, like a muse, to the idea that people are the genius itself. I think fame has fallen prey to the same trap, that is, that once upon a time people were interested in creating or conquering, and the fame/immortality would follow, but now they just want to tweet/sex tape their way to stardom. Perhaps that will be the unfortunate legacy of the rapid growth of the 20th/21st centuries - that the ride is so swift and twisting that there is a need to get in quick at whatever cost.

But I agree that it all stems from a fundamental desire to maintain a solid self.

Impossible.

*

sorry - just erasing double post, silly computer.

Thanks for the thoughtful

Thanks for the thoughtful post.

All that good stuff: fame, death, legacy and all the questions it brings:  "wtf am i doing with my life?", "Is my life meaningful?", "How will people remember me?"... not to mention the specter of death itself, the giant tiger in the room at all times, staring balefully into our eyes. Could we ever not be afraid of it? Certainly our culture gives us no help, and its messages teach us to fear death, and even aging, with an unhealthy desperation. (our fear of death probably takes years off our lives, ironically). Weirdly, you posted this just as i was writing a journal entry about death. I guess I will attach it in this discussion, as well, asking everyone's forgiveness for always writing too much...

This week is bookended by what would have been my husband's son's 17th birthday (Monday) if he had not been hit by a car 4 years ago, and the anniversary of my father's death, Saturday. So the week has been filled with the contemplation of death. It sounds morbid, but it really isn't... it was a very beautiful, soft time. one of those pauses where you feel shaken a little by the beauty of the smallest things around you and gratitude for the people still here with you. When death comes to the people you love, you suddenly feel intensely your own aliveness. yes, yes, of course there is grief, and years do little to diminish it. but it brings a fierce awareness of the mystery that is this strange wondrous beautiful, heartbreaking, joyful, eccentric privelege -  existence.

Little endings come continuously. Nothing stays the same. We leave a relationship, a job, a home, school, children go off to college. Financial booms go bust. Accepting the fundamental nature of continual change seems like it would be useful. But there is little to help us with that. I'm for the old stories... you know, like myths and such. they are so grand and full of life, death, rebirth, wheel of fortune kind of stuff. My dad used to read us Grimm's fairy tales every night before bed. The real ones. i loved them. It's a tumultuous, crazy world, and the good stories are the ones that help us be at peace with the truth of it all.

thank you

Brought to tears reading your comment. No wonder it's the subject of so much poetry. Thanks.

--this printed twice, grr...

--this printed twice, grr... just erasing :)

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <blockquote> <br> <cite> <code> <dd> <div> <dl> <dt> <em> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <li> <ol> <p> <pre> <span> <strong> <ul>
    Allowed Style properties: clear, color, float, height, margin, margin-bottom, margin-left, margin-right, margin-top, text-align, width
  • You may embed videos from the following providers archive, bliptv, dailymotion, google, guba, imeem, lastfm, livevideo, metacafe, myspace, revver, sevenload, spike, tudou, twistage, ustream, ustreamlive, vimeo, voicethread, yahoomusic, youtube, zzz_custom_url. Just add the video URL to your textarea in the place where you would like the video to appear, i.e. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw0jmvdh.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Site developed by the IDP and Genalo Designs.