When I learned late last night that Osama bin Laden had been killed by a United States special forces operation, I really wasn’t sure how I felt. I wasn’t inspired to go downtown and join the throngs of people celebrating the death of a man who caused so much death and suffering for others.
I didn’t feel much like celebrating anything at the same site where so many people had the worst of possible choices during the final moments of their lives: should I die by jumping out of this window in front of me or just stand here and be burned to death by the approaching fire?
Yet somehow I understood the sense of joy and relief felt by so many people everywhere around the world, and when I was able to locate and touch just a trace of that feeling within myself I had to cringe. Yep, still human.
As practitioners we’re called upon to look more closely at things and consider things not just as isolated and unrelated events, but rather like links on a very long and twisted chain. It’s easy to be fooled by the appearance of things and it’s very tempting and even understandable to want to take some pleasure from what would otherwise be considered a pretty gruesome event. It would be wonderful to consider this the “end of the war or terror” as one political pundit put it on CNN last night. But nothing is simply an “end”; all things are both a result and a cause that lead to other results.
I could view the murder of Osama Bin Laden as the ultimate form of justice. After all, he was responsible for the death of so many people, and his actions contributed to a chain of events that we are all still paying for dearly today: several wars, billions of dollars, increased security at the risk of privacy and freedom, more fear, a sagging economy, record high unemployment and a damaged national spirit.
At the same, our country has contributed to the circumstances and conditions from which Osama bin Laden was able to thrive enough so that he could recruit people who felt so angry at us that they were willing to die in order to harm us.
If we were able to peer into a time machine and look forward several years, would we be rejoicing if we realized that the killing of bin Laden resulted in the reenergizing of Al Quaeda? That his death reignited their mission and fueled their determination more so than ever before?
It’s not “wrong” to take pleasure in bin Laden’s death. I can’t say I’m not happy he’s gone, and I realize there is a chance that this could at least disrupt and possibly even cripple Al Quaeda both organizationally and otherwise, but I can’t be sure. Time will tell as it always does.
Before waving our flags in victory however, it’s useful to consider a few questions:
Do the teachings of interdependence no longer apply when it comes to a person who commits heinous acts?
Are we really separate from Osama bin Laden and the causes and conditions that enabled him to do the things he did?
Does karma have a “beginning” and “ending” point?
What are the possible ramifications of his death?
Do wars and murder really ever lead to peace?
From the Dhammapada:
Hatred can never put an end to hatred;
Love alone can. This is an unalterable law.
interACTS
Categories
- Activism and Politics (356)
- Arts and Media (448)
- Buddhism (994)
- Community News (98)
- Events (47)
- Meditation Practice (653)
- Nutrition & Body Wellness (176)
- Religion & Spirituality (234)
- Science & Technology (54)

Comments
a complicated subject...
To tackle in the clearest of minds or times - but I feel your views are warranted, balanced and succinct.
Rarely do I feel it necessary or diplomatic to take pleasure in the death or killing of another. It's important to keep in mind that it is the frail will of others that will unquestionably do as these people wish that gives them such power(s).
Who is the more wrong? Those that inspire or those that follow their will blindly with no greater sense of justice or morality?
And looking over this from a greater historical perspective, in more ways than not it would seem the U.S. Government fueled and funded this genocidal person (Bin Laden) in the first place.
Though part of me is glad he is out of the equation - it really gives my mind no rest, nor 'pleasure'.
From Woody Allen's film "Love and Death":
-anthony galante
"We got him"
Very thoughtful piece Lawrence. I work downtown across the street from the Trade Center and it's been like a big party down here, people waving (or wearing) flags, crowds at the bars last night, a lot of "we got him," "rot in hell" headlines, The celebration is disturbing. What now? There is still a war going on.
thank you
I was beginning to think I was crazy and alone not to feel like celebrating over this. Thank you for your perspective.
Spot On
Lawrence,
Love it, the quote:
"Hatred can never put an end to hatred;
Love alone can. This is an unalterable law."
Thoughtful post
The idea that anyone should "rejoice" or feel "triumphant" about anyone's death, even someone like Bin Laden, is kind of obscene, but it seems like that is how we are expected to react.
Word Game
I appreciate you being considerate in your choice of words. I'm not one to play word games and did not want to turn it into a word game either. I just think the word murder carries a lot of weight and has a connotation that is not appropriate in this situation. Bin Laden was responsible for the killings of several thousand people and was intent on killing more. The act of bringing him to "justice" could be viewed as self-defense. I think the killing of Bin Laden raises a lot of important questions. Was it justified? Is it ever right to kill? One question that I think is clear though is we should not "celebrate" his demise. While I feel the killing of bin Laden was necessary, it's not a victory. In fact, the celebrations of it will lead to an escalation of the cycle. We all remember how we felt when people in the Middle East danced in the streets after 9/11.
I completely agree with you on your more important points and I don't mean to nit-pick.
vengeance is a lazy form of grief
was writing about this as well (here) in the bleary hours of the morning, watching my different emotions come up, different reactions arise, while reading a twitter feed that was poignant, hilarious, often tasteless and full of the stark honesty of unedited opinions.
i was interested to watch my enjoyment of Obama's retaliation of sorts on donald trump at the correspondents' dinner and to feel the contrast with the heavier mix of emotions and deep sadness i felt at his "success" in having Bin Laden killed later in the same day. both situations appealing to the same sense of righteousness that so often gets me in trouble.
Lani asked this before in a post... is there ever a situation in which violence is ok? I would fight to defend my children, i am certain.
I have a difficult time reconciling the animal fight instinct that we are born with as an evolutionary survival tool with the profound desire to truly lay that down and get on board 100% with the concept of non-violence, ahimsa, equanimity. When discussing Gandhi with a class recently, one of my most angelic, innocent students, a 9-year old girl, replied simply, "But we are not born to be Gandhi. We are born as ferocious wolves. That is human nature."
But revenge as a policy doesn't work. period.
So how do you step out of the cycle of retaliation? what does that look like? what does it look like in our most intimate relationships? and what would it look like on the global stage?....
great post
Thanks for this post. My feelings echo Jon's about being shocked by the celebration, but glad he is dead. After this sunk in, I remembered a story I heard regarding one of the Buddha's former lives. The story says he killed a pirate on a ship because he knew if he didn't, this pirate would cause harm and kill others. I may misunderstand the story, but it seemed to explain this as a compassionate act towards a larger good. From this perspective, could the killing of Bin Laden be viewed as a act of compassion towards the larger global community? I'm not suggesting this as a reason to celebrate, but understanding this as an unfortunate act that would eventually lead to a larger good?
killing for the greater good
I am familiar with that story and in that instance it was a pretty cut and dry situation. Someone on a killing spree should be stopped.
In the case of Osama bin Laden, there are many, many more considerations to be made. It isn't so cut and dry. Perhaps his death will prevent the loss of more lives. Perhaps the ensuing anger after his death will inspire more terrorist acts in the future that will result in the loss of even more human lives.
We just don't know yet.
It's easy to get sucked into a sense that justice has been served because it's easier on the brain than considering what this might ultimately lead to: less suffering or more suffering?
Thank You
Causes and conditions.
Interdependence would tell me that this ONE MAN can not possibly be THE ONLY MAN responsible for the attacks on 911. Those acts had causes and conditions, which were likey the acts of people and institutions.
But we love heroes and enemies. We love to know WHO DID WHAT.
I haven't found a sense of relief in myself yet.
What will our Metta practice look like this week?
Homicide is not necessarily murder
I have to take exception with your choice of the word murder to describe the killing of Bin Laden. Killing or even execution Inthinknwould be more appropriate. Murder implies an illegal, unprovoked act. At a minimum, the United States had a right to bring this murderer of thousands to "justice"
As a Christian and a practitioner, I couldn't agree more that we should not celebrate anyone's demise. I am sober about Bin Laden's death, glad a murderer has been stopped but mourning the cycle of violence that continues and the killing of a sentient being.
words
I rarely do this but I changed "murdered" to "killed" in the first line because I don't want this to turn into an issue of semantics--I think the broader issue is more important to consider here.
Thank you for your comments though.