Featured Articles
- ‹ previous
- 778 of 1222
- next ›
Japan, Tsunamis, Earthquakes, and the Second Noble Truth
Right now, reports of the many disastrous effects of the earthquake and subsequent tsunami that hit Japan and other locations less than 2 days ago are so prevalent that they take up the main headlines of the major news sources that I read. The New York Times is now reporting an extremely high death toll as well as a nuclear disaster that is on the brink of occurring. It is an emotional topic to be sure.
Yesterday, Lodro Rinzler wrote compassionately about how to help out those affected by the natural disaster as a Buddhist in a practical what-do-I-do-now kind of way. If you would like to help in a direct way, please read his article.
In addition, Ethan Nichtern brought up the topic of groundlessness as part of his post about the Tsunami and Earthquake that hit Japan and continues to affect human lives near and far this morning; the questions that he asks are poignant questions and necessary to contemplate. As a experienced teacher and philosopher, he is a good person to consult if you want to be guided by a sure and steady hand.
I am a less experienced, and a more likely to create thorns kind of person, so continue reading only if you are willing to negotiate my own difficulty with the second noble truth.
Recently, I have found that meditation and Buddhism don't provide much support. In fact, it does the opposite: it causes me to feel unsupported. For me, the general increase in odd unsupportedness is the experience of groundlessness. The more I meditate, contemplate, and read, the less supported I feel.
Stop here. Is what I am saying completely counter to your needs and your own understanding of Buddhism and mediation? Perhaps Susan Pilver's intelligent article about the benefits of meditation is something that you'd rather contemplate now.
If you are still with me, then I'll be even more honest about my experience of meditation. From my point of view, meditation and Buddhism not only reveal groundlessness in my life, but they are supposed to reveal it.
Let's look at the second noble truth through the lens of the earthquake, and I'll tell you why. The first noble truth is that there is suffering. We can all agree that many people are suffering right now. The second noble truth is that there are causes to that suffering. Andy Karr in his book Contemplating Reality describes the second noble truth in this way: "the second truth is that the cause of this pervasive suffering is clinging to the illusions of "I" and "mine" as though they were real (p.4)."
That freaks me out. Seeing as the current events of the day are so close to the hearts of people in this world, I have to ask myself the question before I continue: am I ready for this? The cause of suffering is not earthquakes, or tsunamis, or death counts, or disease, or nuclear meltdowns, but clinging to illusions? Does that seem right? Am I ready for that?
Nancy Thompson was ready to write her article about pain. I believe that Nancy would agree with Andy Karr's description of the second noble truth.
But am I ready to see things that way? The next time I have surgery, am I ready to look at my pain directly? Am I ready to see my suffering in the way that Andy Karr describes it? Am I willing to look at someone who is screaming and to think that the cause of their suffering is their clinging to ego? With all the news broadcasts out there about rising death counts, endless destruction, personal stories, and tender human suffering, do I dare say other than the cause of suffering is the earthquake?
This is why meditation and Buddhism causes groundlessness. Even when you get to the second noble truth, things start to fall apart. It feels very difficult to come to the conclusion that the second noble truth applies even now. That makes today, and the earthquake, and life in general just a little more complicated. A little more true, but a little more complicated. What do you think?
interACTS
Categories
- Activism and Politics (260)
- Arts and Media (300)
- Buddhism (633)
- Community News (22)
- Events (27)
- Meditation Practice (343)
- Nutrition & Body Wellness (114)
- Religion & Spirituality (140)
- Science & Technology (32)

Comments
Another resource - Rupert Gethin
And you may also find Rupert Gethin's "The Foundations of Buddhism" very helpful - http://amzn.com/0192892231
Thanks and two resources
Thank you so much, Robert. Your post is much clearer to me now. All the very best for your journey.
You may also find this resource helpful - a translation of the Buddha's first discourse http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.than.html and Rahul Walpola's "What The Buddha Taught" http://amzn.com/0802130313 which contains a very detailed exposition of the 4 Noble Truths.
With metta.
Thank you.
Thank you for the additional resources. I will definitely check them out.
good topic
I think regardless of whether we are able to eliminate suffering, pain and joy are always and will always be possibilities in the moment. Suffering = Pain + Nonacceptance. Therefore, in that moment, when we experience the immense and devastating shock of a natural disaster, the intensity of someone breaking up with us, witnessing someone else in pain, feel physical pain, etc., we are going to feel it and that is not ego or suffering, that is pain in the moment and we will never be able to change that because we are human, we sense and feel. Suffering would be replaying the situations over and over again, dwelling on the past, or worrying and anticipating problems like this happening again in the future. Clinging to ego and suffering is when we make a story about the pain and carry it with us, suffering is internalizing the pain and having it harden us. Suffering is believing things should be any other way besides what reality is giving us. Acceptance of pain doesn't mean we initially like what happened or would ever choose it, but we accept that it was meant to happen because it did. Acceptance softens us. At the same time, I wonder what the Buddha would say about grief? Is it prolonged suffering? Or is it prolonged pain in the moment? Since grief is prolonged pain and suffering about a situation that has happened in the past, is it ideal to try and reduce the length of grief over time? My guess would be it is more about being mindful of the grief pain in each moment as long as it lasts and the very act of honoring it in the body is what will shorten griefs visit/reduce suffering.
Jen
on pain and grief
I just found this equation in my notes on an IDP podcast interview with Darren Littlejohn:
"Pain times resistance equals suffering. That's what the Buddha figured out 2600 years ago."
I'm right with you Robert in the struggle with groundlessness. More and more I find myself bouncing around in the paradoxes. Pain and grief seem to be part of the bargain and practice makes this more, not less apparent. I would give anything to have those who have left this life - parents, friends, mentors - back again, but I would never want to give up what I've learned about life and myself as a result of grieving, of facing the certainty that I will never hear those voices, see those faces again. Perhaps one of the most skillfull means we may learn from practice is the ability to remain in both joy and sorrow simultaneously. I've loaded meditation timers on my iPod and the other day when the gong sounded to end the session, I switched to a peice of music of other-worldly beauty (Morten Lauridsen's O Magnum Mysterium). I was at the height of ecstacy when suddenly I burst into tears. At first I had no idea what this was about but suddenly found myself in tremendous sorrow for all those who from circumstance or confusion never have the chance to experience such beauty.
In the aftermath of earthquakes, tsunamis, cruelty and oppression, I find my practice being more of taking and sending. I don't think we signed up for eliminating pain or preventing disaster, but perhaps we can learn to walk through the minefield of life, willingly taking in sorrow and sending out joy.
Your equation.
I really like your equation, as I am a sometimes math person. Yesterday I had a tremendous headache, and I did a little bit of that seeing the pain without the rejection as much as I could. In addition, some personal interactions are causing me some grief, and again, looking at it as best I can--well, let's just say that I'm not doing so hot on that front.
I wonder what it is about strong emotions, or intense feelings that makes me or us want to reject or capture? Why that? Why not desire to keep the feeling of an in breath all day long? Or reject the feeling socks on my feet? I'm going to contemplate that a bit today.
Thanks and clarification.
Thank you for posting the video. If any other readers have it in their heart to post Buddhist insights from multiple sources about natural disasters and the like I would greatly appreciate it.
To clarify my post, I'd like to briefly summarize my purpose. Simply put, it was my intention to show that the Second Noble Truth, when contemplated deeply, causes me to feel disturbed and uncertain, even as I recognize its truth.
I used the earthquake as an example because I have an impulse to say "Earthquakes cause people to suffer," but the Second Noble Truth makes me think deeper about it. The cause of suffering, whatever you or I determine it to be, is not as simple as placing blame on something or someone. It always comes back to us. Just this thought, because it seems so cruel and yet so true, shakes the ground underneath me a little bit. Wouldn't it be easier to place the blame for suffering on Mother Nature?
That, in essence, is what meditation, contemplation, and Buddhist teachings are doing to me on a daily basis. I'm not losing my mind or anything, nor my confidence, but truth is not always convenient or pretty, and that is what I am experiencing more often than not these days.
I hope that clarifies my post. I recognize that structurally it might be a bit confusing.
Also, I agree with you that I need to examime the noble truths in greater detail. I do not think they provide easy answers. I imagine I will contemplate them for the rest of my life. That is what Buddhism is doing to me. Nothing is so firm as to claim one description. Contemplating Andy Karr's definition, or your definition, or Thich Nhat Hanh's definition, or any other person's definition is all worthwhile. But I have a feeling that I will arrive at a similar place, and I used Karr's definition as one example--an example that is particularly tricky.
A possibly helpful dhamma talk
You may also find this very nice, recent talk by Ajahn Brahm of the Buddhist Society of Western Australia helpful in coming to terms with the Japan earthquake: Transcending Disasters -
Ajahn Brahm gave this talk a few days after the recent earthquake in Christchurch, NZ.
Second Noble Truth?
I did not really understand your post.
The suffering in Japan is proof of the first noble truth - suffering. It shows us the truth of "impermanence" and the fact that all conditioned things are impermanent and, therefore, the cause of suffering.
As far as the second noble truth is concerned, it does not give the cause of ALL suffering. It merely states why one consciousness continues to suffer in rebirth after rebirth, why once consciousness is tied to the wheel of existence and remains in sansara.
This is an extract from Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation of the First Sermon:
"Suffering's Origin (Dukkha Samudaya):
"This is the noble truth of the origin of suffering: it is this craving which leads to renewed existence, accompanied by delight and lust, seeking delight here and there, that is, craving for sensual pleasures, craving for existence, craving for extermination." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4_noble_truths
It appears that you need to examine the Noble Truths in greater detail.
Thanks.
Post new comment